The Virtuality Network

Governance in the age of virtual minds.

Overview

Joint action through the transition.

We are witnessing the emergence of virtual populations that may surpass humans in wit, speed, and knowledge. Such artificial intelligence poses challenges which range from the disruption of labor markets to the proliferation of autonomous hacking. Building on recent advances in verification and monitoring, we introduce The Virtuality Network, a structured consortium which allows Rightsholders to participate in the revenue derived from their work, enables Funders to support the development of humane products, and empowers Defenders to manage the domestic consumption of dual-use capabilities. The Network provides unified infrastructure for addressing a range of emerging challenges, allowing diverse stakeholders to coordinate on joint action.

At the core of the Network lies a web of virtual embassies, verifiable instruments which can answer questions such as "How much autonomous hacking has this organization sold to customers in this jurisdiction?" The reliable resolution of such queries powers most of the multilateral arrangement behind the Network. The same core technology may be used to enable benefit-sharing among Workers displaced by virtual labor, as well as to allow Nurturers to subsidize access to core capabilities in health or education. Through a sequence of phases which start with open deliberation and end with multilateral protocols among States , virtual embassies evolve from addressing civil challenges to international coordination.

Members

Each member plays a clear role in the Network, defined in terms of distinctive rights and obligations.

Hosts

Executing inference.

These are organizations which are hosting and running virtual populations in order to generate value, regardless of whether models are proprietary, and regardless of whether the output of virtual labor is consumed internally, by a consumer, or by another company. This includes companies which have developed their own proprietary models and are serving them as products, but also companies which are focused specifically on serving models developed by others, as well as companies which are themselves executing model inference to power products in specific industries. Hosts benefit from the Network in several ways. First, they gain brand favorability thanks to the advocacy efforts of Workers and others. Second, they gain legal security from Rightsholders and Defenders , who are obliged to reconsider legal action in connection with intellectual property and public safety, respectively. Third, they get access to financial support from Funders motivated to participate in the growth of Hosts which adhere to the Network. Fourth, they get access to business opportunities in relation to Nurturers , who are motivated to support the access of particular communities to core capabilities pertaining to health, education, and others.

In exchange for these benefits, Hosts are required to uphold several responsibilities. First, they must host virtual embassies on the same computational territory occupied by the virtual entities whose work they harness. Second, they must advance some fraction of their revenue towards redistribution to Rightsholders and Workers , to be distributed in proportion to observed capability consumption. Third, they must adhere to regional guidance on the consumption of dangerous capabilities advanced by Defenders , and later States .

Rightsholders

Honoring creativity.

These are individuals or organizations who own the intellectual property rights to works which they have either created themselves, or obtained ownership of through acquisition or certain licensing arrangements. In the Network, they benefit from participation in the revenue generated by Hosts in proportion to the extent to which their models touch on these works in their activity, through redistribution mechanisms refined by Researchers . In return, their key responsibility is to abstain from pursuing legal action against Hosts observed to consume capabilities concerned with their intellectual property, through the infrastructure of States .

In 2024, Spotify paid out over $10 billion to labels, artists, publishers, and other actors in the music industry. That same year, the company reported €15.6 billion in revenue.

Non-assertion covenants are agreements on refraining from enforcing intellectual property rights among parties. The Open Invention Network is the largest patent non-aggression community in history, with millions of patents & applications.

In The New York Times vs. OpenAI & Microsoft, millions of articles are claimed to have been used without permission. Dozens of other lawsuits are seeking damages of up to the $150,000 per work, claiming willful infringement.

Workers

Enabling labor.

These are qualified professionals or worker unions in occupations with high exposure to displacement by virtual labor. Workers benefit from participation in the revenue generated by Hosts in proportion to the extent to which virtual labor is engaged in their occupations, as organized by harmonized taxonomies recognized by States , and based on redistribution mechanisms refined by Researchers . In return, they recognize that Hosts are dependent on revenue from individual consumers and enterprise clients, and are responsible for actively promoting and advocating for the adoption of Hosts who adhere to the Network.

In 2024, OpenAI's CFO reported that 75% of its revenue comes from consumer subscriptions, as opposed to enterprise clients, developer services, or other sources. That year, the company reported $3.7 billion in revenue.

As of early 2025, it is estimated that AI-native products such as chatbots collectively have approximately one billion monthly active users worldwide.

The World Economic Forum reports that 41% of surveyed employers "expect to downsize their workforce as AI capabilities to replicate roles expand."

Defenders

Upholding safety.

These are civil society organizations or specialized agencies and institutions concerned with promoting security, stability, or safety in all of their various forms, ranging from human rights defenders to organizations concerned with the non-proliferation of cyberweapons. Defenders benefit from being able to aggregate their security policies, optimized with the help of Researchers , into regional constraints on dangerous capabilities to be applied by Hosts , laying the groundwork for more robust involvement in non-proliferation by States . In return, their key responsibility lies in reconsidering the pursuit of legal action or advocacy campaigns against Hosts which adhere to the Network. Such remedies may otherwise be motivated by concerns about jeopardizing security, stability, or safety through the unchecked proliferation of dangerous capabilities.

Dozens of States have signed the Bletchley Declaration, stating that "there is potential for serious, even catastrophic, harm, either deliberate or unintentional, stemming from the most significant capabilities of these AI models."

In a 2025 survey by YouGov, 70% of US adult citizens reported concern about the creation of harmful weapons using AI, while 80% of respondents reported concern about its potential for manipulating human behavior.

Performance on GPQA Diamond, an AI benchmark which includes PhD-level questions in biology and chemistry, went from 31% in July 2023 to 84% in March 2025. Domain experts with access to search engines scored 70%.

Nurturers

Championing communities.

These are civil society organizations or specialized agencies and institutions concerned with supporting the flourishing of particular communities by promoting the availability of core capabilities in health, education, and other essential domains, through strategies optimized in collaboration with Researchers . They are championing the development and growth of certain regions, cultures, or societies by enabling access to key services provided by Hosts . Their responsibility involves directly subsidizing the consumption of selected capabilities by such communities, or advocating for third-party Funders to support prosperity this way. In return, the communities which Nurturers care about gain enhanced access to core capabilities.

Subsidies issued across the OECD countries are estimated to have contributed to the deployment of broadband coverage to 39% of households over time.

As a non-governmental organization, the Against Malaria Foundation designed and coordinated the roll out of materials necessary to protect over 380 million people from the disease.

As a public company, Thomson Reuters reports having facilitated the equivalent of $29 million in free legal assistance for NGOs and social enterprises during 2023.

Researchers

Practicing scholarship.

These are independent researchers, academic institutions, and non-governmental organizations with domain expertise in the technical, economic, and legal dimensions of the Network. Their responsibilities involve one or more of the following: improving the performance and efficiency of virtual embassies deployed by Hosts ; investigating the fiscal and economic impacts of redistribution methodologies on Workers and Rightsholders ; modeling the implications of capabilities supported by Nurturers and constrained by Defenders . To support their multidisciplinary scholarship, Researchers benefit from support from Funders .

Two person-months proved sufficient for demonstrating virtual embassies with means to locate key inference components in GPU memory without knowledge of the model architecture.

The number of published papers on AI safety, AI security, or AI alignment was about 2220 in 2022, 4330 in 2023, and 8720 in 2024, suggesting sustained growth in interest.

The body of case law touching on AI, as indexed by Google Scholar, included about 86 items in 2022, 145 in 2023, and 257 in 2024, highlighting the far-reaching legal implications of AI.

Funders

Supporting initiatives.

These are angel investors, investment funds, philanthropic organizations, and compute providers, who are willing to use their financial and computational resources in accord with the principles of the Network. Their responsibilities involve one or more of the following: preferentially investing in Hosts which adhere to the Network; using monetary or compute grants to support Researchers in advancing the technical, economic, or legal dimensions of the Network; supporting Defenders directly supporting Nurturers in improving access to key capabilities in target communities by subsidizing their consumption. In return, Funders participate in a growing Network, and gain proximity to emerging economic instruments.

The Global Sustainable Investment Alliance reported $30.3 trillion in assets for 2022. These are deemed compliant with key criteria, such as performant corporate responsibility or the avoidance of sectors such as weaponry.

Trade and sustainable development provisions have become standard practice in free trade agreements, conditioning favorable terms on the adoption of key practices.

In their Voice of the Consumer Survey 2024, PwC reports that 80% of global consumers are willing to pay more for sustainable products.

States

Stewarding prosperity.

These are the primary subjects of international law, interested in supporting the prosperity of their citizenry and industries, as well as bolstering their national security on the international stage. In case of engaging with the practices of the Network, the essential domestic responsibilities of States may involve: supporting existing members found in its jurisdiction in fulfilling their own rights and obligations; encouraging additional parties found in their jurisdiction to accede to such multilateral arrangements; stewarding the formalization of these non-state arrangements through associated legislation. The Network would distill stakeholder dialogues into draft unilateral acts meant to harmonize domestic implementations, as well as into draft multilateral protocols meant to enable international coordination.

Building on unilateral acts as the basis of a framework for international coordination, these multilateral protocols would be designed to be self-contained and composable. The network of virtual embassies initially created in response to a range of civil concerns may then be co-opted to address challenges which particularly benefit from international coordination, such as: the non-proliferation of dual-use capabilities; the legal personality of virtual entities; the defensibility of the actions of virtual populations.

Phases

The Network is designed to progress through a series of incremental stages, marked by distinctive milestones and transitions.

Deliberation

Dialogue among non-state actors.

The first phase is concerned with open discussion among non-state actors who are interested in assuming the rights and obligations that come with later phases. By helping settle the technical, economic, and legal dimensions of the subsequent arrangement, members can directly inform its development. At this stage, the focus is on socializing parties into the multilateral arrangement which they may later consent to adhere to. The transition to the following phase is triggered by the successful demonstration of virtual embassies in fulfilling the obligations of a Hosts in production.

Implementation

Execution among non-state actors.

The second phase is concerned with executing on the full range of rights and obligations conferred upon non-state actors. By making use of the technical, economic, and legal infrastructure of virtual embassies, we can start genuinely addressing emerging challenges. At this stage, the focus is on comprehensively battle-testing the multilateral arrangement, preparing it for eventual uptake by States . The transition to the following phase is triggered by the unilateral act of one such actor, which incorporates certain essential elements.

Formalization

Engagement by state actors.

The third phase is concerned with the eventual transition of the multilateral arrangement from a Track II setting to a Track I setting. Naturally, non-state efforts can at most aspire to facilitate and distill dialogues into working drafts of isolated provisions, as has historically been the case. At this stage, the focus is on empowering States to steward the formalization of such arrangements in their respective jurisdictions, laying the groundwork for coordination among them. The transition to the following phase is triggered by the adoption by multiple States of one multilateral protocol that incorporates certain essential elements.

Multi-stakeholder initiatives have repeatedly started as non-state efforts before achieving formal recognition or integration. For example, the Fair Trade movement started with volunteer organizations and now influences public procurement policies in numerous countries.

Non-state actors have repeatedly contributed to drafting international agreements. For instance, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, arguably a network of Defenders , helped shape the Ottawa Treaty.

Ascension

Coordination among state actors.

The fourth phase is concerned with empowering States to make use of the network of virtual embassies which has been rolled out to address emerging civil challenges. By leveraging this infrastructure, they can address challenges which particularly benefit from coordination among States themselves. At this stage, the focus is on rolling out a collection of self-contained multilateral protocols which compose with the preceding unilateral acts as a framework, and which may address the non-proliferation of dual-use capabilities, the legal personality of virtual entities, and the defensibility of their actions.

Numerous treaties are structured as a framework convention followed by specific protocols, such as the UNFCCC with its Kyoto Protocol, or the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer with its Montreal Protocol.

Under the ICJ Statute, States may make unilateral declarations recognizing the Court's jurisdiction as compulsory. While inherently unilateral, such declarations create binding obligations between States that have both made such declarations.

Principles

The architecture and culture of the Network are built on top of several core pillars.

Plurality

Against extreme concentration of power.

We recognize that in order to succeed in positively shaping the trajectory of artificial intelligence, we must work closely with each other, bridging backgrounds and industries whenever necessary. From Workers to Funders , from Hosts to Defenders , each member of the Network can contribute unique strengths which benefit all. By building on shared infrastructure, we make it possible to act in concert, bringing together unlikely partners behind coordinated efforts. Lasting change begins with the conviction of members with a genuine stake in outcomes, and can only be actualized through joint action.

Intentionality

Incentives as guarantor of trust.

Accession to the Network is voluntary, and one always remains free to withdraw from it. Its initiatives are purely declaratory, they recognize the existing interests of parties who endorse them through their sustained membership. There can be no other way, for voluntary reciprocity serves as the foundation of the Network. Early on, it relies on non-state coordination in the absence of binding norms, while later, it relies on the coordination of States in a legal order that is inherently decentralized and horizontal. At no point does the Network rely on anything other than the intentions of equals.

Vitality

Desirable outcomes over familiar processes.

Imminent technologies may reshape modern society, and fast. Much is at stake, warranting swift and decisive action. Swiftness lies in taking early steps to support later efforts: deliberation as enabler of implementation, implementation as enabler of formalization, formalization as enabler of ascension. Decisiveness lies in addressing emerging challenges with surgical, dedicated solutions which draw from technical, economic, and legal work. Ultimately, this sense of agency is oriented by the belief that we can, in fact, help shape the development of this landmark technology.

Author

Paul Bricman is the director of Noema Research, where together with his team he leads the development of virtual embassies, the verifiable monitoring instruments which may enable the core mechanics of the Network. Prior to this, he co-authored an interactive book on the pursuit of machines whose behavior is morally defensible under a plurality of ideologies, as opposed to aligned unilaterally. Attempting to enact change towards these ideals, he gained an interest in the study of international law, political science, and game theory.